For a variety of reasons the last few years have been rather a struggle for me creatively; thoughts and ideas have been patchy at best. It was suggested that I create a sort of mapping of the themes, ideas and inspirations that have been present in my artistic practice over the last thirty years in order to reignite my creative spark. I had found that I was struggling to motivate myself, legacy I suspect of years of working to public art commission briefs and then in the framework of academia for the PhD. I need to restart my practice, get the joy back and the freedom of making work for its own sake … be this through hands-on making or the (un)folding of concepts.

photograph of pinboard containing various images that form a shorthand for ideas and themes present in my artistic practice over the last thirty years.
pinboard, March 2022

The pinboard will be an evolving process … I will add content and create new connections whilst also taking ideas and concepts from it to develop them in new directions (and revisit old ones).

Certain themes and forms begin to coalesce here in the pinboard surface: landscape has been a constant although the intricacies of the term have pulsed and faltered over the years; movement within and of this landscape concept, initially walking and in more recent years running too; the structure of a book (or even a basic folded sheet … or postcard) have long held an important place in my creativity … they are wonderfully democratic forms; some form of text has nearly always been there, be it written content, text as visual material or poetry; and a sense of ordering (through distillation or codification) seen here on the pinboard as the archive, the diagrams, the graph paper, etc. Although much of my work has been visual, I have maintained an interest in working with other senses too (specifically sound but maybe I often take a visual approach to this).

The pinboard contents form a surface of sorts; a surface of connections, relationships and disjunctions. Features gather in loose groupings, establishing dialogue and suggesting difference. The features operate as vessels containing more than they initially suggest; maybe they are adits into creative seams, fractally unravelling as they are interrogated or put into sets with other features. For example, the postcard of Graham Sutherland’s Entrance to a Lane (1939) is a reproduction of a painting that holds a prominence for me in and of itself (it is a little nostalgic perhaps) but it also represents additional meaning … maybe it is the use of colour and brushstroke but probably it is Sutherland’s link to the Neo-Romantic movement and so connections back through to Samuel Palmer and William Blake. A visionary quality that is also there in the mystical work of Paul Nash here, in the pinboard, represented by one of his Wittenham Clumps paintings (Landscape of the Vernal Equinox, 1943) and this gives the slightest echoing nod to Alfred Watkins and his Old Straight Track a New Arcadian mythical wormhole, or perhaps to archaeology.

The image of a wartime operations room forms a meta element within/on the pinboard … it talks to the idea of control and recording of progress in a specific way but also, the pinboard in itself is the process being depicted. An overview is made (if that is possible) and elements are organised into groupings where new dynamics can be interpreted, and next moves plotted. Likewise, the watcher on the watchtower attends to the activity of the pinboard whilst also alluding to an artistic process that forms an element of the pinboard’s content. An observation is made.

The archaeological drawing performs a direct representation of archaeology and all its significance and processes (surveying, drawing, interpretation, etc.) but also, through the word alone, recalls Foucault and his Archaeology of Knowledge … a leap to the PhD container then. The PhD keywords are confined to a box to avoid too much contamination, they are a Pa(h)nDora’s Box of nightmares if not treated carefully and if curiosity becomes too strong! Further, the archaeological drawing and the image of the archive sit well together as they both speak of organisational processes … knowledge is put in an order which in turn makes a sense of that knowledge; a placing in a context occurs and new relationships are realised or recognised, new logics pertain.

Spatial connections arise from the happenstance of the content’s placement within/upon the framework of the pinboard. At other times the placement is more intentional … revision and contemplation of content further lead the placement of new and existing components. The marks of knowledge sparkle and jostle for attention. Connections likewise glimmer and glow (sometimes misleadingly). An obvious connection of contradiction has arisen as the vigorous gestural painting of Peter Lanyon (Soaring Flight, 1960) rubs against the order and control of graph paper, of Ian Hamilton Finlay’s work (Scottish Zulu, 1970), or against the very spirit of The Unpainted Landscape. How can this contradiction be given voice? Can this contradiction fuel creative moves?

Is this a productive friction created through the presence of the two oppositional elements in such close surface proximity … together in this nexus of practice? Visually, conceptually and through modes of approach the elements vibrate their difference. There is a feeling that the grid of order will always imprison, trap, frame, the gestural exuberance and blatant materiality of works like Lanyon’s. But, at the same time gestural energy will ever disrupt or flee the systemic  frame. In Susan Howe’s collages this is often apparent … ruled pencil grids are unable to contain the fluid materiality of watercolour samples or even the collaged found photographs. The paint hovers over and behind the pencil lines whilst the collaged images seemingly overrule all else but are then pulled back in to order through the imposition of a pencilled border line. Typewritten elements and found texts add another shade of potential interpretation. The tension ripples through and across the sheet’s surface.

Across and through much of the pinboard’s surface an air of order and careful process (this is not to say Lanyon’s approach is without care) persists. There is a feeling of colder, rational analysis with a careful distillation down to the necessary elements required to convey an idea or information. There is a structuring of knowledge which the Romantic and the gestural don’t appear to be bound by. Maybe, to put it more simplistically, there is a graphic quality present in many of the elements and yet the very word ‘graphic’ creates problems as what it signifies today is a little unhinged from its etymology of drawing and writing.

This is not to value either approach over one or the other … indeed, to even go along with the pretence that the approaches are oppositional. Both a large Lanyon canvas and an Agnes Martin painting require large outpourings of energy (exertion even) it is maybe that one is much more explosive than the other. Maybe the control required by Martin is at even greater personal cost than the robustly physical painting approach of Lanyon. There is a worry that this apparent opposition is trying to maintain its existence for its own sake and has no benefit to either party of indeed the progress of the practice of the creator of this pinboard.

Right, I’m off to fold something.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s